SWOV homepage
Nederlands  

Using the mobile phone

How dangerous is using the phone while driving?

Many motorists use the phone while driving, thus increasing their risk of a crash. Motorists are 'physically' distracted because they are simultaneously trying to use a phone and control the vehicle. However, the greatest danger is the 'cognitive' distraction: drivers have to divide their attention between holding a telephone conversation and driving a car. That is why handsfree phoning is almost as dangerous as handheld phoning.

 

For example, using a mobile phoning leads to motorists not signalling in time, braking later and with greater force, and insufficiently adapting to awkward traffic situations such as slipperiness.

 

Using a mobile phone results in a four times higher risk of being involved in a crash. In addition, people who often phone while driving also wear a seatbelt less frequently. They also show risky driving behaviour more often, such as drink-driving and driving too fast. This kind of behaviour could be responsible for the crash rate of driving while using the phone being a lot higher than the estimated four times.

 

For more details: Fact sheet Use of mobile phone while driving (pdf)
References

Read further

Distraction inside the vehicle

Is phoning more dangerous than other distractions?

Passengers are a well known source of distraction. However, discussions with passengers are less dangerous than mobile telephone conversations because passengers are aware of the driving situation. During a telephone conversation, by contrast, the other party perhaps doesn't even know that the person he's talking to is driving a car. Listening to the radio also is a much smaller influence on driving behaviour than using the phone.

 

In any case, the trend is that ever more types of distraction in the car will become available, often in combination with using a mobile phone. An increasing number of services, such as traffic information, are becoming available through the mobile phone. Also, telephones increasingly are part of mobile computer applications in the car, such as company computer systems. This is changing the car into a mobile office. Visual information on the telephone can have a negative influence on road safety because drivers do not keep their eyes on the road. The fact that drivers spend more and more time on the phone and mobile phones are becoming ever smaller can also cause problems while driving.

 

Read further

Measures

Can mobile phone use be made safer?

A general prohibition of phoning while driving would annually save an estimated 600 deaths and in-patients in the Netherlands. Because such a total prohibition is not realistic, many countries attempt to limit phone use while driving, mostly by banning handheld phones. Since this also was prohibited in the Netherlands in April 2002, the number of fines for breaking the law has risen to just under 120,000 in 2005.

 

Another measure which is sometimes used abroad is a total prohibition of phoning while driving for particular categories of drivers, such as of school busses or young novice drivers with a provisional driving licence.

Although the effectiveness of such measures is limited in the longer term, information campaigns can cause an improvement.

 

Technical measures such as facilities that make it impossible to phone while driving, can also contribute to reducing the risks. Finally, it is very important that education makes drivers aware of the dangers involved in inattentiveness caused by phone conversations while driving. This also applies to other road users such as cyclists and pedestrians.

 

For more details:

Fact sheet Use of mobile phone while driving (pdf)
References

References

(SWOV reports in Dutch have a summary in English)

 

Braimaister, L.G. (2002). Mobiele computers in personenauto’s en mogelijke effecten op de verkeersveiligheid; Een inventarisatie. R-2002-26. SWOV, Leidschendam.

 

Burnes, P.C., Parkes, A., Burton, S., Smith, R.K. & Burch, D. (2002). How dangerous is driving with a mobile phone? Benchmarking the impairment to alcohol. Report TRL 547. TRL, Wokingham.

 

Consiglio W., Driscoll P., Witte M. & Berg W. (2003). Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in braking response. In: Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 35, nr. 4, pp. 495-500.

 

Dragutinovic, N. (to be published). Use of mobile phones while driving. SWOV, Leidschendam.

 

Eby, D.W. & Vivoda, J.M. (2003). Driver hand-held mobile phone use and safety belt use. In: Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 35, nr. 6, pp. 893-895.

 

Feenstra, W., Hazevoet, A., Houwen, K. van der & Veling, I.H. (2002). PROV 2001 – Periodiek Regionaal Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid. TT02-052. Traffic Test, Veenendaal.

 

Haigney, D.E., Taylor, R.G. & Westerman, S.J. (2000). Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance; task demand characteristics and compensatory processes. In: Transportation Research Part F, vol. 3, nr. 3, pp. 113-121.

 

Houwen, H.K. van der, Hazevoet, A.M. & Hendriks, U.M.W. (2004). PROV 2003 – Periodiek Regionaal Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid. TT04-028. Traffic Test, Veenendaal.

 

Laberge-Nadau, C., Maag, U., Bellavanc, F., Lapierre, S.D., Desjardins, D., Messier, S. & Sidi, A. (2003). Wireless telephones and the risk of road crashes. In: Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 35, nr. 5, pp. 649-660.

 

McCartt A.T., Braver E.R. & Geary L.L. (2003). Drivers' use of handheld cell phones before and after New York State's cell phone law. In: Preventive Medicine, vol. 36, nr. 5, pp. 629-635.

 

McCartt A.T. & Geary L.L. (2004). Long-term effects of New York State's law on drivers' handheld cell phone use. In: Injury Prevention, vol. 10, nr. 1, pp. 11-15.

 

McEvoy, S.O., Stevenson, M.R., McCartt, A.T., Woodward, M., Haworth, C., Palamara, P. & Cercarelli, R. (2005). Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance; A case-crossover study. In: British Medical Journal, vol. 331.

 

NHTSA (1997). An investigation of the safety implications of wireless communications in vehicles. DOT HS 808-635. U.S. Department of Transportation DOT, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NHTSA Washington DC.

 

Patten C. J., Kircher A., Oestlund J. & Nilsson L. (2004). Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. In: Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 36, nr.3, pp. 341-350.

 

Redelmeier, D.A. & Tibshirani, R.J. (1997). Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle crashes. In: The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 336, nr. 7, pp. 453-458.

 

RoSPA (2002). The risk of using a mobile phone while driving. Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents RoSPA, Birmingham.

 

Strayer, D.l. & Johnston, W.A. (2001). Driven to distraction: dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. In: Psychological Science, vol. 12, nr. 6, pp. 462-466.

 

Strayer, D.L., Drews, F.A & Crouch, D.J. (2004). A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Working paper 04-13. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, D.C.