It was not until the early 1970s that it became clear in the
Year |
Measure |
Developments in drink-driving |
|
1974 |
Introduction of:
All this was accompanied by intensive information ('the November Law'). These measures made the first focussed police enforcement of drink-driving possible.
|
1974-1983 Drink-driving in weekend nights declined from 15% in the early 1970s to 12% in the early 1980s. Shortly after the introduction of the 0.05 g/l limit, only 1% of drivers were drink-drivers because they initially estimated the risk of being caught as much higher than it really was. |
|
1984 |
The gradual introduction of electronic breath testers to replace the test tubes, reducing the risk of false negatives and lowering the cost per breath test. |
1984-1986 During the 1984-1986 period the risk of being caught increased considerably and drink-driving during weekend nights declined further to 8% in 1987. The decrease was highest among young drivers, showing a positive effect of the information campaigns. |
|
1985 |
Gradual change from select- to random police checks to increase the general preventative effect of enforcement. |
|
|
1986 |
The Dutch Traffic Safety Association and the Ministry of Health start campaigns focussed on the young. |
|
|
1987 |
Introduction of breath analysis for evidential purposes to increase the efficiency of police enforcement. |
1987-1991 The introduction of breath analysis and tit-for-tat policy led to a further increase of random police enforcement and, with it, an increase in the risk of being caught. The percentage of drink-drivers during weekend nights dropped further to 3.9% in 1991. Alternative transport being available has probably also had a positive effect, but it is unknown to what extent. |
|
1988 |
Introduction of a tit-for-tat policy for the lighter offenders - settlement proposal immediately after breath analysis for evidential purposes - to increase the efficiency of sanctioning. |
|
|
1988 |
Introduction of special public transport for customers of pubs and discos. |
|
|
1991 |
Further extension of the tit-for-tat policy: heavier offenders also immediately receive a filled-in summons to appear in court, usually together with a settlement proposal |
|
|
1992 |
Severer penalties for drink-driving; including higher fines and faster seizure of the driving licence by the police. |
1992-1994 The severer penalties have had no demonstrable effect on drink-driving, which increased to 4.9% in 1994. This increase followed a temporary large decrease of police enforcement because of large scale police reorganization. |
|
1996 |
Introduction of the 'Regulation Measures Driving skills and fitness to drive '. This gives the Minister of Transport the possibility to oblige drink-drivers to follow a three day course on alcohol and traffic which they have to pay for themselves, or otherwise undergo a test of their fitness to drive. |
1995-1999 During this period weekend night drink-driving stabilized at about 4.5%. |
|
1999 |
Introduction of regional police teams for traffic enforcement. |
2000-2004 In the 2000-2004 period the number of random alcohol checks doubled. The percentage of drink-drivers decreased further to about 3.5%. Furthermore the relatively large decrease among the young male drivers is striking. Their percentage being involved in severe injury crashes after drinking decreased from 25% to 22%. |
|
2001 |
Start of the Designated Driver campaign which is regularly being repeated. Establishment of the Regional Traffic Enforcement Teams that resulted in the doubling of random enforcement between 2001 and 2004. |
|
|
2006 |
The legal BAC limit for novice drivers was lowered to 0.2 g/l. |
|
The introduction of the alcolock has been announced, but the precise moment still is unclear.